Dear Prudence: My Fiancée Is Related to a Notorious Criminal...

[minoanmiss]

She's so sensitive that she attacked my cousin over a joke about it.



I’m engaged to a lovely, kind, sensitive woman, “Adele,” who happens to be related to a notorious but long-dead criminal. All her life Adele has been teased about her last name, and sometimes even ostracized when people find out she’s actually related, even though she and her family naturally condemn this man and his actions. We’ve had to postpone our wedding more than two years because of COVID, so finally making it happen is a huge deal.

At the barbecue where we first introduced our extended families, my 15-year-old cousin “Kim” held up a picture of the criminal on her phone and made a terrible joke, despite my whole family having been warned not to mention him. In response Adele threw a small rock at her, unintentionally hitting her in the face and injuring one of her eyes. In Adele’s defense she did not realize Kim was just 15, and assumed (reasonably, due to her clothing and appearance) that she was at least several years older. Kim’s parents raised holy hell, and Adele has been charged with aggravated battery plus aggravated child abuse, which given her personal trauma has been hugely upsetting for her.
Advertisement

The District Attorney, who knows my family, has agreed to drop the charges if Kim refuses to testify. My uncle “Rob”—my mom’s sister’s husband and Kim’s father—told us she would do so if Adele apologizes to her and we agree to pay for 100 percent of her medical and cosmetic treatment, which is still uncertain and may run to tens of thousands of dollars. Rob has a good job, and I’m sure excellent family health insurance. Kim is also lamenting that her injury may prevent her from becoming a pilot, which she’d expressed only casual interest in before. Worse, my entire family has rallied around Kim—so in support of Adele and the vows we’ve already taken in spirit, I’ve disinvited them all from our wedding.

In retaliation, Rob is now saying Kim will refuse to testify only if, in addition to their previous demands, I re-invite my side of the family (he, his wife, and Kim will stay away). I might be more inclined to cooperate if Kim was equally remorseful—but neither she nor her parents have apologized in the slightest, maintaining it was “just a stupid joke” and even insinuating Adele is violent due to her “blood.”
Advertisement

I’m now torn because Adele is pushing hard to just apologize, pay the bills, and re-invite my family. Partly because she is mortified by her loss of temper and the blowup it’s become, and wants to try to repair relations with them; partly because she wants a “nice, normal” wedding with both sides present; but mainly because she is terrified of the slightest possibility of having to spend even a day in prison if Kim testifies against her. Should I go along with this, even though it would (A) cost us a lot of money, and (B) feel like giving my family carte blanche to abuse her—and, by extension, disrespect me—thus failing her at the very start of our marriage? Or should we stand firm, have our wedding without them, and trust that with a good defense attorney, no sane judge will sentence her to prison for reacting to such cruelty as she did?

— Torn Apart

Dear Torn Apart,

You have to go with Adele here. I’m thinking mostly about the amount of stress this situation is putting on her already. She’s nervous about going to jail, she’s feeling pressure from your family, and she just wants a “nice, normal wedding.” Prolonging this by drawing a line in the sand with your family is only going to wear on her. Look, there’s plenty of blame to go around here, and at some point, you do need to talk to your family in a serious manner about their treatment of Adele. However, the fact remains she hit a 15-year-old with a rock. I’m not judging. I’m simply stating facts. It’s hard to come back from. Mend the fences you can; give Adele the day she’s asking for; and then see about reframing your relationship with your family. I suspect that they will continue to make cruel jokes about her and you will probably need to set a hard boundary in the future. But this situation is so complicated, you’re best served by squelching the conflict before it gets worse.

Comments

[syderia]

I don't know if I admire Prudence for not getting into the fact that Adele threw a rock at someone or if I wish she'd made a bigger deal of it.
Because yes, go with Adele, agree to pay for the medical care and invite them back to the wedding and all, but also, dude, you're getting married to someone whose response to a teenager showing a picture on their phone was to physically assault them by throwing a rock at their face.

[tamsin]

Look, it's also not okay to throw rocks at people older than 15.

[cimorene]

+1 to both the above. Yeah, bullying is not okay and it's doubly bad when you've been warned in advance that it's a trigger... but it's ALSO not okay to throw rocks (!!) at people (!!!), and LW's ability to hold these events as roughly equivalent, as it seems that their letter is doing, seems... bad. Hurting people's feelings and physical violence are really, REALLY not the same thing. Yes, Adele thought she was throwing a rock at an adult and "didn't mean to hit them" (...ok), but that doesn't really matter. If you deliberately throw a projectile at someone, that IS assaulting them! If Adele would be significantly more upset to have assaulted a child than an adult (...ok), she should probably in that case spend a little more time making sure that someone is over the age of consent before throwing things at them for her own peace of mind!

The fact that LW thinks his partner accidentally causing tens of thousands of dollars worth of damage would NOT be ample cause to cover their medical costs regardless of their dad's income is pretty mind-blowing, and the fact that LW holds this attitude EVEN WHEN his partner threw the rock on purpose... wow. If Adele isn't genuinely so remorseful that she WANTS to pay the medical costs as far as possible, including feeling upset about possible future loss of function in an injured eye... also wow. I'm inclined to look askance at LW downplaying Kim's plans about the future because, well, LW seems like a dick, and also kids aren't required to have firmly demonstrated their commitment to becoming pilots to their cousins' satisfaction by the age of 15 in order to be sincere. In fact, it would be legit to decide to become a pilot at 18 and pursue it in sincerity, and nobody's chances of doing so should be limited by other people throwing rocks at them (DUH).

Anyway... some of the CBT techniques for anger management, I think, have been shown remarkably effective, and it sounds like Adele really needs something of that kind if a response like that is even remotely on the cards. To say nothing of the therapy she probably needs about underlying issues.

[lilysea]

Argh! :(

I don't care WHAT someone says to you,

the only time it's okay to throw rocks at someone (of ANY age) is if you genuinely believe that they are AN IMMEDIATE PHYSICAL THREAT TO YOU, and you are acting in self defense

[castiron]

If Adele had angrily slapped the phone out of Kim's hand and it broke, my sympathies would be more with the LW, though I'd still say Adele shouldn't have done that and they should pay to replace the phone. Throwing a rock, even if it was more a large pebble, is a level beyond that.

And the only part of "Adele didn't know that Kim was 15" that makes any sense to me is if LW were implying that Adele would have controlled her anger more if she'd known Kim was a thoughtless kid rather than an adult who should know better. Which, again, would get more of my sympathy if Adele's reaction had been less extreme.

If I were LW, I would be taking a look at my history with Adele and asking some hard questions about whether this really was a one-off (which it may well be!) or whether Adele has a history of lashing out -- especially if I were planning to have kids with her eventually.

(But also, if I were Kim's parent, I would be saying to Kim, "You did an asshole thing. Your cousin said 'don't tease Adele about her notorious relative', and you still did. Yes, Adele was totally wrong to throw a rock at you. You did not deserve to be assaulted. But you absolutely instigated this.")

[movingfinger]

They could just not do a giant invite-everybody wedding and get married with two witnesses at town hall, but that solution never seems to occur to anyone.

As for the Kim, I wonder whether alcohol may have been a factor? What else was going on? Sounds like a charming family, and on the basis of this scorched-earth barbecue maybe Adele should reconsider marrying this guy, anyway.

[shirou]

I don't think I need to say anything more about how one shouldn't throw rocks at people. So as an aside, this line stood out to me:

and, by extension, disrespect me

Out of everything going on in this letter, LW just couldn't help but make it about himself.

[conuly]

Hoo-boy.

1. Adele needs to apologize and pay up, and LW needs to support this whole-heartedly. Because while LW's family, and also Kim, are very much in the wrong, it's not the sort of "in the wrong" that merits a physical response of this nature. It's the sort of "in the wrong" that merits disinviting them from the wedding and going low-contact, perhaps.

2. LW may need to invite these assholes to the wedding, but then they need to start limiting contact, because they're total assholes. Holy fuck, such assholes. The lot of them.

3. It may be in Adele's best interest to change her name and not marry LW and their terrible family. Like, I don't know, but I'm not getting a good feeling about the future of that relationship.

[sathari]

...I'm going to be a dissenting opinion here.

LW's niece (I refuse to write out even her pseudonym) has apparently learned the opposite of empathy--- that it is fun to cause other people distress and that she can do it with impunity because she does not feel other people's distress that she caused as a bad thing, in fact the opposite and that her well-connected family will cover it up if any of the people to whom she causes distress for her amusement do the only things that will make her feel in any way bad about the distress she causes others, namely cause her physical pain. (Seriously, the level of entitlement you have to have as a legal minor to torment and mock a totally-strange-to-you legal adult who is about to become a member of your family and thus might end up with guardianship rights, however temporary, over you is staggering to me.) I bet that if news of this has gotten out in the wider community, there are a whole bunch of LW's niece's other victims who are quietly cheering on Adele. And also that maybe Adele should take this as a warning sign and back away slowly from that family, who have clearly enabled LW's niece to think that she can knowingly and deliberately torment other people for her own amusement with impunity. And this is the carefully worded version of my response to this.

[lavendertook]

My sympathy is with Adele because what horrible no good luck she has because an eye is such a small target if she had intended to hit it, and if she intended to just hit her foot or even somewhat appropriately the phone, it wouldn’t have been so bad--but this is why all physical violence has to be off the table.

And what is bad luck for Adele here, is probably very good luck for the world. Because how frightening would it be for such a psychopath from a psychopathic family to be in control of such a powerful instrument for hurting people no matter the kind of plane or helicopter she would be flying with lack of any empathy for her passengers or with which to consider commands as a military instrument. I hope this accident prevents her ability to be a pilot and thank you, Adele.