minoanmiss (
minoanmiss) wrote in
agonyaunt2022-05-06 11:08 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Care & Feeding: My In-Laws Are Way Too Far Into Our Business
[n.b, that is NOT the problem, or rather, ti is a dilution of the actual problem]
Dear Care and Feeding,
My in-laws are pretty great in every way, but there’s one major point we disagree on: religion. My husband is atheist; I was raised agnostic. His parents Catholic, attend services weekly, and participate in tons of church activities. They were absolutely shocked when we had a friend marry us instead of a priest, but other than the occasional cross necklace for my birthday, they haven’t really bothered us about our lack of faith. However, they have started to push religion more now that we have children. Our daughter is 3; our son is a newborn. My in-laws been regularly gifting things like holy water and children’s Bibles that I’ve carefully set aside, should the kids show any interest when they’re older. Recently my mother-in-law texted us to mention that she bought two fairly ornate crucifixes she would like to hang above the door to each child’s room. They are somewhat graphic, in my opinion. We firmly refused, saying we were not comfortable hanging such things in our home. But the decision seems to have hurt my in-laws’ feelings, seeing as they haven’t spoken to me since. I’m not sure what to tell them about future gifts, or if and when they ever want to take the kids to church.
—Clashing Over Crucifixes
Dear Clashing Over Crucifixes,
I hope when you firmly refused, you did so while acknowledging your in-laws’ good intentions, their love for you and their grandchildren, their devotion to their faith, and your love for them. If you did not, I would follow up by doing so now. This is unlikely to be the last time such a thing comes up. And in fact it’s not the first—it’s only the first time you weren’t able to sidestep without a confrontation. You note that your in-laws already know you and your husband are nonbelievers. There’s nothing wrong with the two of you making it explicitly clear you aren’t raising your children in the Catholic faith. But there’s also nothing wishy-washy about recognizing that your in-laws mean well. If you make yourself absolutely clear (right now, and again and again as necessary), it will get easier, I promise. It will take fewer words each time. You may be tempted to make a blanket rule about this—no gifts related to religion ever, no church, no proselytizing—but I wouldn’t. I’ve found that people are often tempted to try for one big fix, hoping they’ll never have to deal with a version of that problem again. But this hardly ever works (unless one counts an angry confrontation that leaves everyone with bitter feelings as “working”). I would take each thing as it comes up in the spirit with which it is meant until your in-laws finally get the message and give up. (Or until the children are adults and their grandparents still haven’t gotten the message, and it’s their own problem to deal with.)
—Michelle
Dear Care and Feeding,
My in-laws are pretty great in every way, but there’s one major point we disagree on: religion. My husband is atheist; I was raised agnostic. His parents Catholic, attend services weekly, and participate in tons of church activities. They were absolutely shocked when we had a friend marry us instead of a priest, but other than the occasional cross necklace for my birthday, they haven’t really bothered us about our lack of faith. However, they have started to push religion more now that we have children. Our daughter is 3; our son is a newborn. My in-laws been regularly gifting things like holy water and children’s Bibles that I’ve carefully set aside, should the kids show any interest when they’re older. Recently my mother-in-law texted us to mention that she bought two fairly ornate crucifixes she would like to hang above the door to each child’s room. They are somewhat graphic, in my opinion. We firmly refused, saying we were not comfortable hanging such things in our home. But the decision seems to have hurt my in-laws’ feelings, seeing as they haven’t spoken to me since. I’m not sure what to tell them about future gifts, or if and when they ever want to take the kids to church.
—Clashing Over Crucifixes
Dear Clashing Over Crucifixes,
I hope when you firmly refused, you did so while acknowledging your in-laws’ good intentions, their love for you and their grandchildren, their devotion to their faith, and your love for them. If you did not, I would follow up by doing so now. This is unlikely to be the last time such a thing comes up. And in fact it’s not the first—it’s only the first time you weren’t able to sidestep without a confrontation. You note that your in-laws already know you and your husband are nonbelievers. There’s nothing wrong with the two of you making it explicitly clear you aren’t raising your children in the Catholic faith. But there’s also nothing wishy-washy about recognizing that your in-laws mean well. If you make yourself absolutely clear (right now, and again and again as necessary), it will get easier, I promise. It will take fewer words each time. You may be tempted to make a blanket rule about this—no gifts related to religion ever, no church, no proselytizing—but I wouldn’t. I’ve found that people are often tempted to try for one big fix, hoping they’ll never have to deal with a version of that problem again. But this hardly ever works (unless one counts an angry confrontation that leaves everyone with bitter feelings as “working”). I would take each thing as it comes up in the spirit with which it is meant until your in-laws finally get the message and give up. (Or until the children are adults and their grandparents still haven’t gotten the message, and it’s their own problem to deal with.)
—Michelle
no subject
your advice is so wrong I don't currently have time to write out all the ways in which it's wrong.
Dear LW: go ahead and impose that no-religion ban, and check on your in-laws' ability to sue for custody in your state. And hug your kids for me..
no subject
The grandparents do not, in fact, mean well.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(I mean, how does this come under any kind of heading of 'acceptable gift'? Isn't it supposed to remain in churches?)
no subject
no subject
I wouldn't think anything of a Catholic friend offering me a vial of holy water any more than I'd think twice at a friend offering a packet of herbs to burn to cleanse the house's energies or a hand of Fatima to keep the evil eye away, it's a general "I care about you and want you to be safe so I am sharing my culture's traditional protections with you" thing.
no subject
(I wonder if holy water would burn me. Hahaha.)
no subject
We do kind of suspect if anyone drinks the Lourdes water it will kill them, but that's because it's been in the bottle for at least 35 years through several moves and we don't how the bottle was originally sealed.
no subject
Huh, I would absolutely give a mezuzah to a religious Jewish friend or a hamsa or chai to a Jewish friend of any religiosity, but would never give either to a non-Jew, because protective talismans are culturally dependent. Nor would I give holy water to a Catholic friend or sage to a pagan friend, because the giver's belief in the talisman is part of the relevant context. And I would be deeply weirded out, at a minimum, if my not-in-laws gave me Christian talismans -- or Jewish ones, for that matter.
no subject
I guess I feel like there are some protective talismans that are okay to take outside the believer's community and some that aren't. Like if someone gave me a crucifix or a rosary or a saint's medal without knowing we were both Catholic, that would be weird, and a bible definitely smells of proselytizing, but holy water and some kinds of votive candles feel different, as do some but not all of the pagan ones and things like evil eye talismans and so on.
I definitely wouldn't give anything like that to a friend who I didn't know was okay with it, but if someone who I knew was steeped in the belief system it came from gave one to me, I would assume it was them offering protection to me, not them trying to push their beliefs on me.
no subject
In theory, maintaining rapport when negotiating with a loved one might be a good idea. Yet prefacing every "no" with "I know you mean well" is NOT good advice when you're dealing with someone who is trying to bully you by continuing to push something against what they know to be your preferences. (And it's also not really true, because they meant to bully you, and that is not benign, even if their attempt to override your own adult judgment is motivated by concern or love.) The conciliating note comes across as softening the message, and encourages them to continue to push against the boundary. The boundary should be firm and unequivocal.
And it's not good advice when someone keeps trying to convert you when they know you're not interested in their religion. And it's even worse advice when they are a member of the societally dominant religious majority.
And it's definitely the WORST advice when it's a grandparent continuing to push and bully their adult offspring to override their parenting about anything... because as others noted above, that's a major red flag.
no subject
and unless Grandpa is a priest, I'm not sure how they're getting holy water to 'gift'. last I knew (though it's been many a decade since I darkened the doors) the Catholic church doesn't sell little vials in a gift shop
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I can totally see social distancing having affected how blessings were conferred (loved the pictures priests with a squirt gun early on)
no subject
Plain holy water wouldn't be worth it, because yes, the last Catholic church I was in, they had a little thing by the door where you could fill a bottle to take home.
I think it depends a lot on what kind of Catholic you are, but a lot of Catholics I know will keep a bottle or two of holy water around the house just in case.
no subject
I hadn't even thought about holy water from special sites like Lourdes! I can see how that would be available.
I think I was about 13 when I stopped attending services; while I remember the font, I didn't notice anyone dipping water out to take home - it probably happened, but didn't register with me. I don't think my grandmother kept any at home, though my aunt might have.
no subject
I think my cousins' Catholic church, the only other one I've been to in recent memory, had a font but no easy way to take any home, but it's been a lot longer since I visited there, so maybe it's a new thing or maybe not every church has one.
no subject
Don't leave the kids alone with these people.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nothing you mentioned in the letter sounds like a clear warning sign that your in-laws are going to be outright coercive or abusive about their faith. (Also, it's unlikely the kids were baptized without your knowledge, because that would be difficult to do within current Catholic doctrine, unless you have reason to believe that their specific church/priest would do it anyway.) What it does seem like is that they've decided to act as your kids' godparents even absent the ceremony, and are trying to do for them the things they expected to do for a grandchild who was also a godchild.
Are you okay with the kids being exposed to Christianity by their grandparents? Are you willing to talk to them in age-appropriate ways about differences between your beliefs and their grandparents'? From what you said about 'setting things aside', it sounds like you at least aren't upset by the idea that they might decide to become Christian for themselves, later. (Does your husband agree?) There's nothing wrong with exposing them to the religious aspects of their heritage through their grandparents early on if neither of you feel strongly against it, and teaching them about religion in a reasonable way from early on can be protective against people trying to exploit them with it when they're older.
That said, especially if your husband has any qualms at all about how his parents handled religion with him as a kid, you should keep communication open with the in-laws, and the kids as they get older, about what they are being taught and being exposed to. If you want to keep a relationship you might find that "we want the kids to know about your religion but not feel like they're required to be part of it" will work a lot better than just shutting down about it.
On the other hand, if you or your husband do have reason to believe that they will get coercive or abusive about it, then you need to figure out what hard boundary you are going to set and get ready to hold it against all comers.
(Also, it almost seems like the actual problem in this letter is "we told them we don't like their crucifixes and now they aren't talking to us". LW, did you turn them away in a way that implied you aren't comfortable with visible expressions of your in-laws' traditional culture, or did you turn them away in a way that explained you didn't want graphic torture scenes in your kids' rooms? Because those are probably going to ring very differently to the in-laws and you should probably figure out which one they heard you say before you go any farther.)
no subject
no subject
Even if the grandparents *do* mean well and agree to try not to overstep, LW should still make an effort to sit down with the kids and talk over whatever the grandparents tell and show them and help them put it in their family's context. And that will hopefully let them catch it early if the grandparents cross lines.
no subject
Catholicism, man.
no subject
But we really don't know much other than that list of gifts so it's really hard to say. I do feel like with changes in the church over the last generation (including the limbo changes) it's probably a lot less likely, though.
no subject
(Funny story: A friend's mother was taught about emergency baptism, an example being if a baby were on train tracks and a train was approaching. She used to walk home next to tracks every day, always watching for a baby she could baptize. The thought that maybe she might want to move the baby didn't occur to her until much later.)
(This was also one of several reasons she always said you could tell Rosemary's Baby wasn't written by a Catholic. Rosemary was raised devoutly Catholic in the same generation. As soon as she saw that weird little demon baby, she'd have been throwing water at it while speaking Latin.)
(I'll spare you my talk on why Polanski made that who situation even worse, because no one here needs an extra reason to hate on Polanski.)
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.
no subject
Today I leanred something!
no subject
I disagree - I think the grandparents have done a DIY baptism at home with some of that holy water...
no subject
Like Catholics can do home baptism in extremis like anyone else, but I think the kind of Catholics who are sending holy water to their relatives would feel strongly enough about the ritual that they wouldn't do the emergency version unless they really thought it was an emergency. I mean it's certainly possible they are so deranged they do think the kids are in imminent danger of going to Hell immediately, but all we really heard in the letter is that they are sending the kind of presents a godparent would send, so I really suspect they're holding out for a priest.
If they were some denominations other than Catholic it would be a lot more likely.
I really need a Catholicism icon
And wow, I write long sentences.
Anyway, point being: IME, most cradle Catholics or serious converts who were very young Boomers or very old GenXers would prioritize getting the baptism done over who did it, limbo still being a thing then.
no subject
no subject
I didn’t think the advice was great - firmer boundaries and a clear discussion would help. They need to be clear to the Catholic grands what is ok - Noah’s Ark play set, yes, bloody crucifix, no. I’m in a religiously diverse family so if I want to make a gift that has some religious aspect, I ask in advance.
But I really appreciated the mother’s wrapping up and setting aside religious gifts for later as a thoughtful way to give the kids a chance as young adults to decide for themselves about part of their heritage.
no subject
I've identified LW's problem here. They've viewed an occasional cross necklace (!!!!) as a birthday gift as "not really bothering" them, instead of as outrageous overstepping of personal boundaries.
no subject
no subject
Fwiw I think most Catholic wouldn't think of a crucifix as graphic/weird or much different from a cross... I know that's probably strange outside the religion but just like, it's normal... Plus, I'd imagine the issue isn't with the aesthetic properties so better not to confuse the issue ('ah we just have to give them more tasteful religious art!!')
I'm interested in the husband's perspective on his parents & on catholicism. As an atheist lapsed/former Catholic, it's definitely a complicated situation for me. Thankfully, I'm never having kids.