minoanmiss (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
minoanmiss) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
agonyaunt2022-04-21 01:30 pm
minoanmiss) wrote in agonyaunt2022-04-21 01:30 pm
Entry tags:
The Moneyist: My Husband's Daughter Asked Why I Am His Life Insurance Beneficiary"
[That's the abbrieved title.]
‘We believe his ex-wife put her up to this’: My husband’s daughter asked me why I am the beneficiary of her dad’s life insurance instead of her. How do I respond?
One of my husband’s children told me she was shocked when her dad told her I was the primary beneficiary of his life insurance. The next day I received two texts from my stepdaughter stating that she could not understand why her father did not include his three kids on his life insurance.
What’s more, my stepdaughter said that she feels he doesn’t love her, and she asked me to give her a reason why her father didn’t put her and/or her siblings on his life insurance. We believe his ex-wife put her up to this. I am unsure how I should respond to her claims.
We are now going to put together a will, and get a lawyer to make sure this is all tightly stated correctly. I have children of my own as well. This stepdaughter feels that she has a right to whatever her father owns since she lived longer with him. What are your thoughts?
Wife and Stepmother
Dear Stepmother,
Some children want the biggest slice of apple pie and ice cream. Others want your life insurance.
Whatever your stepdaughter says, this conversation is not about love. It’s primarily about money. It is inappropriate to have this conversation with you, as the beneficiary. She is leveraging whatever guilt and pressure she can to steer the life insurance her way.
We should not be held hostage to other people’s text messages. No response is a response. Electronic communication is an inadequate form of communication. Emails and texts should be left for housekeeping issues — “I’ll be 5 minutes late!” — rather than important life issues.
The primary purpose of life insurance is to provide a payout to the remaining dependent — often times the person’s partner or spouse who may be left with a reduced income — rather than inheritance for children. It’s also not a testament of someone’s love for another person.
In addition to covering living expenses, a mortgage, medical expenses, funeral costs or any other debts, life insurance can also bring a person peace of mind. Simply knowing that it’s there is enough. He may wish to explain that to his daughter, but he is under no obligation to do so.
To measure love with money misunderstands both concepts. If people did not mix up the two, there would likely be far fewer letters to the Moneyist about inheritance or property. Parents would not, for instance, feel coerced into quit-claiming their properties to their children.
Your husband has every right to name you as beneficiary on his life-insurance policy. He does not need to get into an argy-bargy with his daughter about what she believes she deserves. And you can pick up the phone if you wish to respond, and say, “Talk to your father.”
He could tell her, “It’s inappropriate for you to quiz me about my estate plans and involve your stepmother. If I grilled you, and said you didn’t love me enough to leave me a portion of your assets, how would you feel?” Like she’d just eaten five-day-old fish, is my guess.
Your stepdaughter is not the first person to weaponize life insurance as a way to show love or a lack thereof, and she definitely won’t be the last.
‘We believe his ex-wife put her up to this’: My husband’s daughter asked me why I am the beneficiary of her dad’s life insurance instead of her. How do I respond?
One of my husband’s children told me she was shocked when her dad told her I was the primary beneficiary of his life insurance. The next day I received two texts from my stepdaughter stating that she could not understand why her father did not include his three kids on his life insurance.
What’s more, my stepdaughter said that she feels he doesn’t love her, and she asked me to give her a reason why her father didn’t put her and/or her siblings on his life insurance. We believe his ex-wife put her up to this. I am unsure how I should respond to her claims.
We are now going to put together a will, and get a lawyer to make sure this is all tightly stated correctly. I have children of my own as well. This stepdaughter feels that she has a right to whatever her father owns since she lived longer with him. What are your thoughts?
Wife and Stepmother
Dear Stepmother,
Some children want the biggest slice of apple pie and ice cream. Others want your life insurance.
Whatever your stepdaughter says, this conversation is not about love. It’s primarily about money. It is inappropriate to have this conversation with you, as the beneficiary. She is leveraging whatever guilt and pressure she can to steer the life insurance her way.
We should not be held hostage to other people’s text messages. No response is a response. Electronic communication is an inadequate form of communication. Emails and texts should be left for housekeeping issues — “I’ll be 5 minutes late!” — rather than important life issues.
The primary purpose of life insurance is to provide a payout to the remaining dependent — often times the person’s partner or spouse who may be left with a reduced income — rather than inheritance for children. It’s also not a testament of someone’s love for another person.
In addition to covering living expenses, a mortgage, medical expenses, funeral costs or any other debts, life insurance can also bring a person peace of mind. Simply knowing that it’s there is enough. He may wish to explain that to his daughter, but he is under no obligation to do so.
To measure love with money misunderstands both concepts. If people did not mix up the two, there would likely be far fewer letters to the Moneyist about inheritance or property. Parents would not, for instance, feel coerced into quit-claiming their properties to their children.
Your husband has every right to name you as beneficiary on his life-insurance policy. He does not need to get into an argy-bargy with his daughter about what she believes she deserves. And you can pick up the phone if you wish to respond, and say, “Talk to your father.”
He could tell her, “It’s inappropriate for you to quiz me about my estate plans and involve your stepmother. If I grilled you, and said you didn’t love me enough to leave me a portion of your assets, how would you feel?” Like she’d just eaten five-day-old fish, is my guess.
Your stepdaughter is not the first person to weaponize life insurance as a way to show love or a lack thereof, and she definitely won’t be the last.
n.b.
no subject
*dingdingdingdingding*
Anyone know knows me knows I have Feelings about life insurance. My dad was...something? not a salesman, but something like it. He also died at 45. I believe everyone who can afford it should have at least enough to deal with funeral/burial costs, that couples who don't have children should also consider what losing half their income would mean, that SAHP should probably have bigger policies than "breadwinners" (think about all the childcare and housework that will now have to be covered), and that $500K isn't a startlingly large amount but rather a pretty good estimate.
All that said: when my daughter is no longer dependent on us, I will likely cash in my private whole life policy and rest assured that what I get through work will take care of the spouse. No, I don't feel a pressing need to leave my adult daughter half a mil.
But yes: LW should politely refuse to discuss the matter with her stepdaughter, and keep doing it until either SD drops the matter or storms off in a huff.
no subject
no subject
I never understand why people think they are entitled to $$ after someone dies. They could leave it to their local SPCA if they want to. No one has claims to another person's money. And I don't understand the greediness other have over it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nope, important life issues involving legal anything need a paper trail.