minoanmiss (
minoanmiss) wrote in
agonyaunt2019-12-17 02:26 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Dear Prudence: EPIC TREE WAR
Q. Passive-aggressive Christmas ornaments: I have had an exclusively beach-themed Christmas tree for about 15 years because it matches my home's decor and, quite frankly, I'm a bit obsessed with all things seaside. All my ornaments are sentimental, from trips and the times I've lived by the ocean. I had children a few years ago (who are ocean-themed-named), and my mother-in-law wanted to start getting them ornaments. To my horror, last year she got each of them several forest critter ornaments and aggressively asked why they weren't on the tree. When I capitulated and put them in not-visible areas, she got upset and moved them up front. She is generally domineering toward me, and this is just one more bizarre outlet for her.
My husband doesn't want to get in the middle (he doesn't care about Christmas anyway), and I have floated a small tabletop tree idea for the girls, but he's not wild about that either. I am really thinking about the long-term—these ornaments could pile up and take over my theme, which would make me sad. I take a lot of joy from my mermen, octopuses, flamingos, etc. Am I being unreasonable, or should I make a stand?
A: On the one hand, I don't love that your husband has attempted to stay out of "the middle." Saying he doesn't care about Christmas but continuing to let the two of you plan it, while he presumably still shows up/eats the food/looks at the decorations/marks the holiday with you, strikes me as a little weaselly. But on the other hand, I can’t join you in a sentiment like "To my horror, my children received forest-themed tree ornaments." Even if your mother-in-law is a really difficult person, I don't think this is the battleground to start with. If there are other areas where you'd like to say no to her and you want to enlist your husband's perspective and support, by all means have at it. And by all means limit the number of her ornaments you put on the tree if they're threatening to tip the tree over. But adding, say, three to five stoat- and pine marten–themed ornaments to an otherwise consistently marine Christmas-scape isn't going to hurt. Figure out the important things you need to change, talk to your husband about helping you maintain a polite, relatively friction-free relationship with his family, and let this one go.
My husband doesn't want to get in the middle (he doesn't care about Christmas anyway), and I have floated a small tabletop tree idea for the girls, but he's not wild about that either. I am really thinking about the long-term—these ornaments could pile up and take over my theme, which would make me sad. I take a lot of joy from my mermen, octopuses, flamingos, etc. Am I being unreasonable, or should I make a stand?
A: On the one hand, I don't love that your husband has attempted to stay out of "the middle." Saying he doesn't care about Christmas but continuing to let the two of you plan it, while he presumably still shows up/eats the food/looks at the decorations/marks the holiday with you, strikes me as a little weaselly. But on the other hand, I can’t join you in a sentiment like "To my horror, my children received forest-themed tree ornaments." Even if your mother-in-law is a really difficult person, I don't think this is the battleground to start with. If there are other areas where you'd like to say no to her and you want to enlist your husband's perspective and support, by all means have at it. And by all means limit the number of her ornaments you put on the tree if they're threatening to tip the tree over. But adding, say, three to five stoat- and pine marten–themed ornaments to an otherwise consistently marine Christmas-scape isn't going to hurt. Figure out the important things you need to change, talk to your husband about helping you maintain a polite, relatively friction-free relationship with his family, and let this one go.
no subject
no subject
Myself, I would go for the separate smaller tree for the kiddies idea, that was my thought too when I read of the LW's dilemma.
(also, what an overbearing MIL, sheesh!)
P.S.
no subject
I cannot believe that a letter starting with that first sentence could make me have an opinion even roughly in defense of the letter-writer, but... I think DP is wrong here.
The letter-writer is a bit nuts for being stuck on her whole-house decor theme, but it's still her house and her Christmas tree. If this was about her children asking or wanting to put ornaments of their choice on the tree that didn't match her theme, I would feel a lot less charitable towards her, although she could still maybe negotiate with them. But there's no indication how the children feel about it at all, and absent that, nobody's mother-in-law has the right to dictate what goes on their Christmas tree or where.
The ornament is a small issue that would be a non-issue for most people, but the key is that her MIL knows it is important to the LW, which makes this a deliberate attempt to violate her boundaries. MIL is trying to show dominance by trying to find a way to piss off the LW that she can get away with in order to trap the LW between capitulating and letting MIL 'win' or looking like the asshole. And the mere fact that she's trying to play a fucked-up game like that means the LW should squash the attempt calmly and without justifying or arguing.
Also, I hope this woman looks around more and finds some tips about dealing with a partner who thinks they can recuse themselves from conflict between their own parent and their spouse.
no subject
Wait, what?
no subject
There are layers. I'm on the side of the peanut butter dick person in that one. It was labelled! This is a good example of why you do not eat food that is not yours.
And I'm on the side of beach-theme tree person here. You like what you like and your MIL can have her very own Christmas tree in her very own space. Or the kids can have their own tree with all the kid-made ornaments they will make in school and the ornaments from their grandmother.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'd not eat another person's peanut butter, first, of course, because it's theirs, and second, some people lick the knife, etc....(although a scenario such as this one would have never occurred to me!) :P
no subject
I just read that for the first time (yes, to quote XKCD< I'm in the lucky 10000, er dubious luck in this case) and I don't understand why it got rated an "Everyone Sucks"
Ifhe had done it to try to catch out the roomates that would be one thing but he was using but it's clearly explained that he and GF were using the peanut butter for their own pleasure and it had nothing to do with the roommate (except for the part where because of the label there was a reasonable expectation of roomate should either respect that or be forewarned)
no subject
Even without the whole 'putting his genitals in the food' bit, roomie shouldn't eat someone else's labeled food. Stealing someone's food item they were not using for food pourposes is just another reason to leave their stuff alone.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
so yeah - a small tree with ornaments picked out or made by the children, and the forest critter ornaments can have pride of place there.
no subject
I think there could be a cultural divide between LW and MIL; some family christmas trees are "all the sentimental ornaments, who cares how it looks" and some are "carefully chosen and designed theme". I have always been Type 1 but Type 2 people aren't *wrong*, and it's not like it would have been hard for MIL to find ornaments that fit the theme.
no subject
"I know what'll show that impudent twit my son married! I'LL MESS UP HER CHRISTMAS TREE THEME!" omg what. *giggles helplessly*
no subject
I mean, if you tried to marry into anywhere in my mom's family with a strictly themed tree that didn't let kids put their own ornaments on, you would probably get a lot of that kind of thing muttered behind your back. Especially if you had named your kids to match the theme.
MIL is not *right*, but she probably has convinced herself she's standing up for a (silly) important principle.
no subject
no subject
But LW had kids "a few years ago," which means they're probably fairly young, and the MIL picked out the ornaments AND THEN "GOT UPSET" AND MOVED THEM INTO MORE PROMINENT POSITIONS ON THE TREE when LW diplomatically put them on the tree, but in an unobtrusive place.
This is a dominance move by the MIL, and I have zero sympathy for her -- picking "several" forest-critter-themed ornaments for each ocean-named child is not an accident . . . and if it had been, "getting upset" and redecorating the LW's tree is boundary-trampling.
(Why, yes, my mother has been very critical of my home-decor skills/choices over the years, why do you ask? LOL. She's actually a master-level amateur decorator, and her house IS beautiful and tasteful and full of gorgeous antiques -- but I like my action figures, framed Nagel posters, weird dolls, and Halloween tat, and I'm not interested in making my house into a hyper-clean museum of decorative vases and silk flowers!)
no subject
But I can't stop giggling.
no subject
The small tree for the kids does sound like a great idea, and it's entirely okay if the kids don't want that to become a proxy war battlefield for Grandma's weird war on Mom's harmless preferences.
no subject
no subject
1. This woman is not getting out of her children's childhood in one piece if she doesn't learn to let go. Based on what I'm guessing the kid's ages are, they are about to start having Opinions about their clothes, their Halloween costumes ($5 says she's dressed at least one of them as a mermaid/merman already), their room decor, and all the things that are going to disrupt her obsession. And I mean, I did some heavy-duty indoctrination of the child, so I get it, but she still wants to watch the Kardashians.
2. Also, she needs to start processing NOW that the house is the family's house. Apparently, her husband either is content to let her have her obsession or just doesn't care, but she's going to need to learn to give on the shared space a little. It's the kids' house, too.
Those things said, I think the LW is to some extent looking for a line in the sand to draw with her MiL, something concrete that will let her start taking back control. I am beyond unimpressed that husband is washing his hands of the situation, and I think it's serious enough to warrant both a Come to Jesus talk and some counseling. She can't be the only one drawing boundaries when MiL is just going to walk right over them.
no subject
But/and I can understand having one thing that makes one happy, and maybe the tree is it for her. More importantly, "Those things said, I think the LW is to some extent looking for a line in the sand to draw with her MiL, something concrete that will let her start taking back control. " is why I said I was handing out crackers in my first comment. It's pretty clear the MIL has been pushing on the LW for awhile, and they're both at BEC level vs each other. It's just that envisioning the Christmas tree as the scene for the climactic battle keeps making me giggle and giggle and also giggle.
no subject
And I'm also (as you know, Bob) someone who knows from obsessions. I mean, people here are giggling about the ocean-themed names, and so did I a little, but let's face it: I named my child after a Stephen King character. And I'm beyond grateful that my wee one has, in fact, become a horror fan, but I was really bracing myself for the day when I had to admit that I had never, in fact, read enough Judy Blume to recommend them.
Honestly, I think LW kind of needs to separate things out a bit. Her kids will be bringing home homemade ornaments soon enough (and let me tell you: my kid brother was doggedly hanging his huge plaster oval with an impression of a leaf onto my mother's tree well into his thirties), so she needs to figure out how she's going to deal with the tree in general. I like the idea of giving each child a mini-tree for their own rooms, and letting them choose ornaments for them. And then she needs to metaphorically whap her husband upside the head until he takes some damn responsibility in their family.
(And yes, I giggled, too. ;)
no subject
no subject
That said, the tree as the site of this battle keeps making me giggle.
no subject
What if the husband doesn't think a beach theme is worth fighting over? (I'd agree with him.) I think it's okay for husband to say he's happy to go along with a beach-themed tree, but if this is the battleground LW is choosing, he's not showing up for the fight.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
My mother was super into her tree. And frankly as a kid it wasn't my tree, or even the family tree, it was mom's tree (or tangentially my parents). And my mom got us ornaments every year she put in a box for our own tree, someday. And that is my suggestion. All the ornaments with kids names on them, all ornaments made by children, all ornaments bought with them in mind are put into a box to be given to them when they either move out of the house or pass the age of 18. Mom gets to have her themed tree, kids get a keepsake box where all their precious items go for their future trees.
no subject
no subject
The kids can have small trees each, and free reign within the margins of safety [no electrical hazards, no trip hazards]
Tell MIL "I don't want tree ornaments as presents. Any tree ornaments that you give me will go straight to the Op Shop" and STICK TO IT.
no subject
no subject
Tsunamis of applause!!
no subject
is swept away by a flood of puns
no subject
no subject
So let her have otters and bears eating salmon.