lilysea: Serious (Default)
Lilysea ([personal profile] lilysea) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2017-10-11 03:00 pm

Dear Prudence: Pets are not family, are they?

Q. Pets are not family, are they?: My childless sister “Sally” and I are close but are having a disagreement. Sally lives several hours away, and my 8-year-old daughter and I try to visit for the weekend about once per month. The problem is that my daughter has severe pet allergies, and Sally has two cats and a small terrier.

Though she keeps her house as clean as possible, the very presence of these pets causes my daughter to sneeze, congest, and sometimes break out in hives. I’ve repeatedly asked Sally to either get rid of them or keep them outside during our visits, but Sally claims that though she loves her niece, she can’t keep her pets outside all weekend because the cats are “indoor only,” the dog is too little to stay outside, and coyotes are a danger. She also told me that I was out of line to ask. Was I? They’re only animals, after all, and her niece is family. When she visits us she boards them or gets a sitter, so I don’t see why she can’t do the same when we visit. She’s also suggested that my daughter take allergy medication, but I find that out of line. Is it? How can we resolve this?

A: The most important thing to do here, I think, is to make sure you don’t let a conversation about reasonable accommodation turn into one about whether your sister’s pets “really count” as family. (I’m on your side in the sense that I think a human child’s health is paramount here, but I just don’t think it will be useful to turn this into a litigation on your respective reproductive choices.)

It’s absolutely fair of you to say that the present situation is dangerous to your daughter’s health. It’s also fair that your sister is anxious about leaving her dog outside for an entire weekend, especially if she lives in a coyote-heavy area. If she were willing and able to hire a pet sitter during your visits, that would be an ideal solution, but since she isn’t, you should advocate for your daughter’s health and stay in a nearby hotel so that she can get a full night’s sleep without having difficulty breathing.

Incidentally, unless your daughter has an issue with allergy medication, I’m not sure why you wouldn’t have some at the ready with you, given that she might have a reaction to someone else’s pet at any time. That doesn’t mean she’ll be suddenly able to sleep comfortably in a house with three small furry animals, but there’s nothing wrong with giving someone allergy medicine for an allergy attack.

fairestcat: Dreadful the cat (Default)

[personal profile] fairestcat 2017-10-11 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
While I agree with the LW that they need to find some compromise, it's pretty clear from their letter that they've probably never owned pets. It's the quotes around "indoor only" that do it. No, if she's a responsible pet owner she can't put her indoor only cats outside for the weekend. They would have no idea how to survive and she'd be lucky to get them back alive.

That said, if she wants to keep seeing her niece she has to find some way to settle this. If her house is kept as clean as LW suggests, then possibly boarding the animals sometimes when her LW and her daughter are in town will be enough. Maybe sometimes the animals can be boarded and sometimes the LW can stay at a hotel, thus spreading the financial burden around a bit.

"just take allergy pills" isn't a long-term solution, but LW should probably acknowledge that her daughter is going to have to take them at least some of the time to cope as she's growing up. It's not possible or even necessarily desirable to always entirely avoid allergens like pet dander that can linger in the air.

Despite my having allergy-induced asthma, it never occurred to my parents to give me any kind of allergy meds on a regular basis, and growing up and discovering long-acting anti-histamines was a revelation for me.