conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2022-09-27 03:40 am

(no subject)

Dear Therapist,

How do I talk about estrangement with my young children? Over the past year my husband and I have gone through a horribly painful estrangement from his parents. We were once very close and our children enjoyed nice relationships with them. As far as we know, our children have only warm, happy memories with their grandparents.

However, after struggling with alcoholism, anxiety, and depression for many years, my husband disclosed to me abuse that took place in his home when he was a young child. His parents have refused to listen, have said his memories are false, and have been completely unable to maintain basic decency when my husband has attempted to speak with them. I feel strongly that it is not safe for my children to have a relationship with them moving forward.

I come from a long line of generational trauma myself. My mother died 11 years ago and my father has Alzheimer’s. If there was any possibility of making it work with my husband’s parents, we would. We have attempted family therapy with them, but each time, the therapists have said it would be more harmful than not for my husband to attend, because his parents refuse to listen.

Our older son has asked about them only two or three times in the past year. I do not want to keep secrets from our children, but I also don’t want to overburden them with grown-up issues. How do we navigate this as our children grow and have more questions for us?

Jennifer
Los Angeles, California


Dear Jennifer,

This is a very painful situation, and I’m glad that you want to be sensitive to your children’s feelings in a way that sounds like you and your husband didn’t experience growing up. Honoring your children’s emotional worlds and then acting in their best interests is an important step in ending generational trauma.

At the same time, I want to make sure that you’re not underestimating the long-term consequences of the decision to cut your husband’s parents out of your children’s lives. Even when absolutely necessary and healthy, such a choice can have ripple effects that last for generations. For this reason, before we discuss the question of how to talk to your children about the estrangement, let’s first explore how the choice to cut ties will likely play out for them in the years ahead.

As we explore this, I want to emphasize that whatever choice you make is understandable, and I can imagine how devastating it must have been for your husband to have suffered abuse as a child and then have his parents shut him down when he confronted them. Because you say that you also suffered from trauma, watching these distressing interactions might have triggered your own anger or sense of helplessness, and one way many of us react to feeling helpless is to attempt to regain control: If you refuse to see the truth, then we refuse to see you.

As adults, we have the freedom to choose whether or not to maintain a relationship with our parents, because we no longer depend on them for our survival. But another benefit of adulthood is that we have the ability to understand our parents as flawed and sometimes damaged people with significant limitations who, for all kinds of reasons, couldn’t be the parents we desperately needed. To be clear, no amount of adult perspective excuses their behavior or takes away from the pain they caused. But with that perspective and power comes a great responsibility, because the adults are making decisions not just for themselves but for the children in their lives. This perspective helps you to assess: Do your husband’s parents’ limitations outweigh the benefits of their being involved, in a form that you get to choose, in your children’s lives?

If you have reason to believe that they will harm your children, then clearly they shouldn’t have access to them. Your letter, however, paints a different picture of them as grandparents: warm and kind to your children—and, before they were confronted about your husband’s childhood, equally warm and kind to both of you. You say you feel strongly that it’s not safe for your children to have a relationship with their grandparents going forward, but you don’t mention why you feel that way and whether your husband agrees. Does he also believe that his parents pose a threat, even though your children “have only warm, happy memories” with them?

Already, your son is asking about his grandparents, and while you say that he has asked about his grandparents “only” two or three times in the past year, in fact that’s a lot for a young child, and keep in mind that he might not have asked about his grandparents every time he missed them. As your children grow, there will be many reminders of their grandparents’ absence—making a family tree in school, seeing their friends’ grandparents being part of their lives, going through old photo albums and seeing strangers or, alternatively, noticing the purposeful removal of the older generation. There are also tricky situations to anticipate—family occasions or holidays such as Thanksgiving and Christmas that your kids will miss out on attending because their grandparents will be there; awkwardness with cousins or other relatives their age who have nice relationships with these grandparents and might talk about them in front of your kids; aunts and uncles who might take issue with your husband’s estrangement of their parents, which would create tension with your husband and therefore your children. There’s also the question of what happens if the grandparents try to send birthday gifts or contact the kids and they want to respond—but know they shouldn’t and feel burdened by that emotional bind. Finally, if your kids eventually have their own children, and they witness the warm relationship you have with their children, they might feel resentful that they were denied the opportunity to have this with their own grandparents.

You write that you don’t want to “overburden them with grown-up issues,” but if you can’t articulate how your husband’s parents are a danger to your children, then cutting off this warm relationship that has the potential to develop into something quite meaningful would indeed be burdening them with grown-up issues that exist only among you adults.

Another thing you may want to consider: Many people like to believe that if, in the future, they reconcile, other relationships burdened by the estrangement will naturally heal as well. But that’s often not the case. If you do someday reconcile, the grandparents will by then be strangers to your kids. It will be difficult for them to form any relationship with them, especially because your kids might feel somehow disloyal if they see their grandparents as good people, knowing that you’ve seen them as bad.

So where does all of this leave you? I’d suggest that you and your husband each see a separate individual therapist to process your respective feelings toward his parents (and for you to understand more about where you might be conflating your past with his), and to gain clarity on whether they truly pose a current danger to your children. If they do, you’ll have an ongoing conversation with your kids over the years about the estrangement, which will change depending on their ages and the kinds of questions they have. Because your children are young, you might start by answering your son’s questions with something like “We aren’t going to be seeing your grandparents right now. The adults have something to work out.” If your son asks, “What are you trying to work out?” you can say, “It’s an adult problem, but I’ll let you know if things change. We would very much like that to happen but don’t know if it will.” If the estrangement continues, and your children want to know why you couldn’t work it out, you might say, “We all tried very hard to see the other person’s perspective, but we just couldn’t, and we wish it were different.” In these conversations, the goal is to create an open dialogue so that the topic of the grandparents doesn’t feel like it’s off-limits, and in that spirit you might share that you, too, are sad about the estrangement. You’ll also want to make sure to check in with your children about how they feel and validate whatever they share—sadness, anger, loss, confusion.

As they get older, their questions will get more specific, and eventually your husband might say, “I had a difficult relationship with my parents and they didn’t treat me well when I was young. This has caused a lot of tension between us that we were never able to resolve.” You’ll know how much of the story to share based on their maturity and the kinds of questions they ask.

If, however, you conclude through the therapy that the grandparents don’t pose a danger to your children, you might consider finding a way to accept that they aren’t able to acknowledge the pain they caused your husband, and encouraging your husband to do some much-needed grief work with a therapist, so that you as a family can be around them, in whatever limited way you choose. This might include setting boundaries, such as supervised visits so you can see how they act around your kids, or letting them know that if they aren’t kind to either of you in front of the kids, the visit will have to end.

Remember that no matter what you do now, your children will one day become young adults who can easily contact their grandparents if they’re still alive. It’s important to let them know that you support whatever relationship they choose to have with their grandparents one day and are always available to answer any questions they have.

In the midst of this challenging situation, it might help to take a deep breath and remember to give yourselves credit for being parents who want to end the cycle of generational trauma and are reaching out for help to do so. What is unresolved inevitably gets passed to the next generation, and your kids will benefit from the effort you and your husband are putting in to changing the narrative for them and the generations that come after.

https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2022/09/children-grandparents-estrangement-abuse-generational-trauma/671542/
haggis: (Default)

[personal profile] haggis 2022-09-27 08:15 am (UTC)(link)
Really strongly disagree with this. These people have already caused significant harm to a vulnerable child - why is the columnist demanding they have the opportunity to cause more harm before you are allowed to take action? The longer you allow these people to be in contact with your children, the deeper the relationship will get and the more painful it will be when you have to break it off.
tamsin: (Default)

[personal profile] tamsin 2022-09-27 08:16 am (UTC)(link)
Whatever choice LW makes is understandable, yet the whole letter focuses on why cutting the grandparents off would be wrong. *rolls eyes*
viggorlijah: Klee (Default)

[personal profile] viggorlijah 2022-09-27 11:08 am (UTC)(link)
I feel strongly based on personal experience that abusive parents should not get access to grandchildren UNTIL the grandchildren are old enough to decide for themselves. This for me means a child who can recognise abusive behaviour and has the confidence and means to leave a bad situation, so it might be a 12-year-old with a supportive parent, or an 18 year old on their own.

I think back to pre-estrangement when I felt obliged to meet with her and the hurtful comments and behavior my kids saw and received and wince.

People outside act like this is a spur of the moment vengeful act - you're not nice to me, so you don't get to see my kids. Those exist, but this letter shows someone whose spent considerable time and thought on a horrible situation and is putting her children's long-term well-being first.

The grandparents don't want to see their grandchildren enough to make therapy viable. That's their choice. These are not grandparents who value their grandchildren more than their own self-image as non-abusive people - they are NOT safe.

I told my kids my mother was abusive to me and I didn't think she would be able to be kind or polite around us, so we weren't going to meet with her anymore. As they got older, I revisited this with them so they had the opportunity to meet her on their own, and some of them did that, then swiftly changed their minds, and others will have very very occasional contact. The same has happened with other grandchildren.

There are other old people who want to dote on your kids and other family members and friends. Find the people who nourish your family, who when you fight, make an effort to come together and find a way forward. Not people a therapist warns you off!
cimorene: Painting of a man on a surreal set of stairs that go on into infinity (labyrinth)

[personal profile] cimorene 2022-09-27 04:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Absolutely. My parents and aunts and uncles were obviously operating on the paradigm of this answer.

They would have described my grandparents as kind and loving grandparents to me and their other grandkids, but I still resent the childhood exposure. They all acted like he'd been through a magical transformation rendering the raging abuser of their childhood into a wonderful guy as soon as they all grew up because he was never violent or threatening after they were all old enough to leave if they wanted, and never violent or threatening to their kids. But that's still the same person! He never even admitted any wrongdoing! In my grandfather's case, there were other bad effects, but I'm almost more disturbed just... from the impact of gradually learning in more and more detail just how bad my mother's childhood was, and the fact that they all habitually ignore it.
feldman: (bruce is bummed you're dumb)

Let's heal generational trauma by pretending everything's hunkydory!

[personal profile] feldman 2022-09-27 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
What a load of disingenuous horseshit; "Therapist" willfully ignores most of the letter to lay a 'what about the children?' guilt trip on LW and spouse.

Like, yeah actually, the whole problem IS the grandsires impact on vulnerable younger people in their sphere. Compounded by their refusal to take any responsibility for the past, or even listen to their hurting adult son, or even remain civil when it comes up.

How is the past abuse real enough to bias the traumatized husband, the present assholery real enough to trigger the LW, yet both held so inconsequential that maudlin sentimentality should overrule the reality of unrepentant ongoing abuse?

'Becoming a grandparent' is not a magical transformation that renders abusers harmless, or makes them worthy of being entrusted with another generation of children.
jadelennox: Senora Sabasa Garcia, by Goya (Default)

Re: Let's heal generational trauma by pretending everything's hunkydory!

[personal profile] jadelennox 2022-09-27 02:06 pm (UTC)(link)

yeah this is fucking awful. First of all, and most importantly, a man has the right to cut abusers out of his life entirely! Becoming a dad doesn't change that calculus, it just complicates it.

But also, jesus fuck, many abusers are warm and loving in front of witnesses, and also often in front of the abuse victims. LW doesn't describe what kind of abuse the dad suffered, but do we assume that the grandchildren aren't getting it, too? If the parents are so bad that other therapists say that therapy isn't worth it, why would we trust them around the grandkids?

Re: Let's heal generational trauma by pretending everything's hunkydory!

[personal profile] hashiveinu 2022-09-27 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
+1000
lethe1: (scared)

Re: Let's heal generational trauma by pretending everything's hunkydory!

[personal profile] lethe1 2022-09-27 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
So much this!
cimorene: cartoony drawing of a woman's head in profile giving dubious side-eye (Default)

[personal profile] cimorene 2022-09-27 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
This enragingly biased response was too much for me to even read thoroughly.

But aside from the fact that this response writer is just giving terrible advice ("The abuser is probably safe now!") that wasn't really asked for (the LW and husband clearly didn't come to their decision with no reflection, and they asked for tips about how and when to talk to their kids)... it starts right off by implying that if the LW's husband doesn't fully agree then she would be in the wrong to oppose contact, but that's completely backwards: if a parent is really convinced that someone is an unsafe adult for their children to know, then the parent's natural inclination, and moral obligation, is to do their best to protect their children regardless! "Allow children to be potentially endangered" is not the same class of parental debate as "Allow children to go to a birthday party".
laurajv: Holmes & Watson's car is as cool as Batman's (Default)

[personal profile] laurajv 2022-09-28 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
as someone who cut off contact with a parent for years because he was doing the same bullcrap around my kids that he did around me & my siblings?

T.h.i.s.
lilysea: Serious (Default)

[personal profile] lilysea 2022-09-27 03:07 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing is, even if the grandparents never abuse the grandchildren (and we can't know that that will be the case)

it would still be okay for the father to say "You abused me, you hurt me, and you have never adequately apologised or addressed this in family therapy, and a consequence of this is that you don't get time with your grandchildren"

access to grandchildren is a *privilege*, not an entitlement/right.
petrea_mitchell: (Default)

[personal profile] petrea_mitchell 2022-09-27 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Definitely against telling the kids nothing, because every book and movie for kids out there says that the family members no one wants to talk about will turn out to be superheroes or royalty.

It seems like there should be age-appropriate ways to talk about this. "They were supposed to keep someone safe but took they took the side of the bully" or something like that.
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)

[personal profile] melannen 2022-09-27 03:59 pm (UTC)(link)
The letter is vague about the abuse, Carolyn seems to be operating on the assumption that the parents weren't the ones that hurt the husband as a child, most of the commenters here seem to be assuming that they were? Is "abuse that took place in his home" a common euphemism I should be reading a particular way?

Like, if your husband's parents were abusive to him as a kid, and are unrepentant and/or in denial, don't let them near the grandkids. You can just say "I know your grandparents were always very nice to you, but we discovered that they are very mean in secret and they lied about it, and we don't want to be around people like that" or something like that.

If the abusers were a babysitter/friend/family member and the issue is the parents not being willing to take their son's word for it, the therapist's advice is maybe not as bad? The parents probably aren't in themselves a risk to the kids, but you still wouldn't want to let them be alone with them, since you can't know if they will expose the kids to other abusers. And of course refusing to support their kid when he brought the problem to him is abusive in its own way, and if being around them is harmful to your husband, prioritize that. But you can still totally explain the problem to them in a kid-understandable way. And this might be a situation where you think about reestablishing limited contact as the kids get older, if they are still asking about it.

Also, you should reach out to find other people of that generation that your kids can get to know. Religious or community groups? Adopt-a-grandparent? Neighbors? People these days are bad at making intergenerational connections outside of families but it's so important and most people are eager to reach back.
cimorene: cartoony drawing of a woman's head in profile giving dubious side-eye (Default)

[personal profile] cimorene 2022-09-27 04:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I read the letter as saying he went to them for help as a young child and they denied and gaslit him about it all along, which as you say would be abusive in itself. But on rereading I think the letter implies that he's only brought it up to them as an adult, perhaps for the first time. If they never knew in the first place, so they didn't do anything wrong at the time, then yeah, it's bad but not at all on the same level. It seem the letter could go either way.
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)

[personal profile] melannen 2022-09-27 06:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I read it as the standard "repressed childhood memories of an abuser come back under therapy as a adult, parents are blindsided and side with their trusted friend over their adult child" which is sadly common. But even if they had no idea until recently, it's still crappy that they're not supporting their kid. (Even if they have actual good reason to believe it's false recovered memories - which are still probably more common than most people would like to believe, because human brains are bad at their job sometimes - their kid is still in a lot of pain! That should their first priority here and it's not!) If that's the case I'd say it's reasonable to cut them off, but also reasonable to carefully keep contact, and probably worth thinking about very hard and not just making a snap emotional call (though even then probably not in the exact terms the therapist is suggesting here.)

But you really can't tell from the letter - it could be anything from that to the parents themselves were routinely committing severe abuse and should be kept five miles away from all children at all times.
minoanmiss: Minoan lady watching the Thera eruption (Lady and Eruption)

[personal profile] minoanmiss 2022-09-27 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I was picturing that someone they allowed in abused him (uncle, aunt, babysitter, family friend) and now they are denying the abuse happened and telling him he's delusional. And honestly, I think that level of disbelief makes it reasonable for LW to disqualify them from being around another set of vulnerable children.

But then I really hate "family uber alles".
melannen: Commander Valentine of Alpha Squad Seven, a red-haired female Nick Fury in space, smoking contemplatively (Default)

[personal profile] melannen 2022-09-27 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I agree, but I think in that specific situation it would be equally reasonable to decide to keep contact as long as the kids aren't alone with them (unlike if they were actively complicit in the abuse, in which case therapist's advice is EXTREMELY HORRIBLE as well as not really addressing the question). It also really changes what you need to explain to the kids and how you should do it and whether it's worth leaving any opportunity at all to let the kids have limited contact again as they get older.
castiron: cartoony sketch of owl (Default)

[personal profile] castiron 2022-09-29 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I had the same question about who exactly was the abuser.

The kids have an existing relationship with their grandparents. Which option -- severing that relationship, or maintaining it cautiously -- would cause least harm to the kids?

If the grandparents were the abusers, then yes, the kids' pain from losing grandparental contact is outweighed by the duty to protect the kids from abuse. But if the grandparents hadn't known about the abuse until their son told them, then I can see allowing the kids to spend time with their grandparents, supervised by LW so that her husband can stay no-contact with them.

And that said, LW's husband would likely be better off with no contact at all, so there's weighing his needs against the kids'. Or if LW can't cope with being the supervising parent knowing what she now knows, then they may have to cut the kids off from their grandparents because there's no one trusted to supervise. A lot would depend on the kids' ages too; I'd expect a nine-year-old who's been close to their grandparents to have more trouble with having that relationship cut off than a three-year-old would.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2022-09-27 08:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, fuck all the way off, Therapist.
lethe1: (lom: angry)

[personal profile] lethe1 2022-09-27 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
+1000
tielan: (Default)

[personal profile] tielan 2022-09-28 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly my sentiments.
julian: Picture of the sign for Julian Street. (Default)

[personal profile] julian 2022-09-27 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Way to not answer the question, Therapist.

Also, way to answer a question that wasn't asked in a truly insulting way. Mmmmost people who think about cutting off contact only do it after a LOT of thought and a LOT of wrangling. You're treating this as a casual decision. Fuggoff.