minoanmiss: Naked young fisherman with his catch (Minoan Fisherman)
minoanmiss ([personal profile] minoanmiss) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2020-02-19 12:45 pm

Ask a Manager: Difficult Ex Is My New Coworker

My contentious ex is now my coworker
Today, my ex (mom of our two kids) showed up for orientation at the hospital were I work (without any heads-up). She’s contentious (especially lately since my new wife and I just had a baby) and she loves starting public screaming matches at inappropriate times (daycare, pediatrician’s, etc). I’m a private person and non-confrontational so I just walk away. I prefer not to work the same shifts in order to avoid conflict and embarrassment, especially since she will resent that she must defer to my directives (doctor vs nurse). I want to go to HR, but don’t know if she disclosed our former relationship and I’m afraid they’ll think I am creating trouble since no conflict has happened, yet. I’m also nervous that if I request not being on the same shift, they’ll send me to back to nights (I transferred to days a month ago after finishing a PhD and with a new baby, I’m enjoying the regular hours). Should I go to HR? How should I approach this and how much should I share?


Whoa, yes, you should disclose it, if only for your own protection in case she causes problems. Say this: “I just learned that my ex-wife, Jane Warbleworth, has been hired here as a nurse. We share two children and the relationship since our divorce has been a contentious one, despite my efforts to minimize that. I wanted to make you aware of the relationship and ask if it’s possible not to have her assigned to my shifts given the difficult dynamic. I’m particularly concerned about her ability to take direction from me.”

You could add, “My strong preference is to keep my current schedule. Is there a way to do both of those things?” There might not be — but my guess is that if you’re the doctor and the longer-term employee, it’s likely that you’ll be given at least some priority.
ambyr: a dark-winged man standing in a doorway over water; his reflection has white wings (watercolor by Stephanie Pui-Mun Law) (Default)

[personal profile] ambyr 2020-02-19 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. And I also think AAM is out of line to suggest "I'm particularly concerned about her ability to take direction from me" as a script; more reasonable, I think, would be to own the problem as "I'm particularly concerned about _my_ ability to supervise and direct her in a fair and unbiased manner."

They could both be perfectly lovely people who divorced through no fault of anyone, and it would still be reasonable to not want to be placed in a supervisory role over each other. Any decent HR department should understand that.
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2020-02-19 10:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. And I also think AAM is out of line to suggest "I'm particularly concerned about her ability to take direction from me" as a script; more reasonable, I think, would be to own the problem as "I'm particularly concerned about _my_ ability to supervise and direct her in a fair and unbiased manner."

Agreed.
mirlacca: still blue flowers (Default)

[personal profile] mirlacca 2020-02-20 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think he needs to "own the problem." As of the moment of writing, the problem didn't exist, and "owning" it amounts to taking the blame ahead of time. If this becomes a workplace issue, that is a BAD strategy. I would suggest something along the lines of, "I'm concerned that placing us in a supervisory-subordinate relationship could be very awkward and not comfortable for our patients."
jadelennox: Senora Sabasa Garcia, by Goya (Default)

[personal profile] jadelennox 2020-02-19 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
it's funny. My gender-politics-goggles made me really uncomfortable about LW's framing, and yet this is also a there-but-for-the-grace situation for me. At least once I had a #MeToo apply for my company; I knew about it because they saw we had the same alma mater in similar years so I was asked for a casual reference, and I said, very carefully, "I can't fairly tell you anything about Person because we had a toxic relationship, so you should trust someone else and not ask me" and, to give my company credit, they said "whoaaaaa we love you and we won't go further with a candidate who makes you unhappy." (This was more than 20 years ago. Today I know about missing stairs and would be more explicit about my reasons.)

But that's hardly a common interaction with a hiring manager, and I have an ex who works in my field in my area, and I sometimes wonder, absently, how I'd approach it if we ended up in the same place. It's a shitty situation for all concerned.
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2020-02-19 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, my eyebrows went up a bit when he stated that she "loves" to start public screaming matches. I mean... maybe? But I'd be a lot more sympathetic if he'd stated simply that the two of them had gotten into loud fights at inappropriate locations without suggesting that she does it on purpose, with no provocation from him, for the sheer enjoyment of it.
teaotter: (Default)

[personal profile] teaotter 2020-02-19 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I think the fact that this is AAM makes a big difference in the advice here. The advice to LW is clearly the most self-protective framing of the situation that they could portray to HR -- whether that framing is true or fair is outside the scope.
jadelennox: Senora Sabasa Garcia, by Goya (Default)

[personal profile] jadelennox 2020-02-19 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
excellent point.