My Son’s Teacher Caps His Renditions of “Old Town Road” to Three per Day
My 5-year-old son is in kindergarten, and things are going very well overall. We like the teacher a lot, but I have a problem with one of her classroom policies, and I’m not sure how best to address it with her. My son enjoys singing and humming. He almost always sings or hums as he goes about his day. The rule in the classroom is that singing and humming are not allowed during instructional or work times, but they are allowed during both indoor and outdoor free play.
That is all very reasonable, and my son is adjusting well to this rule. The problem is that my son and several of his classmates LOVE the song “Old Town Road.” At home, he sings it all day long. At school, the teacher prohibits the number of times they can sing this particular song. They are only allowed to sing it three times per play period, and the only reason she prohibits them from singing it more is that she hates the song. To me, that seems irrelevant. This is the song that brings the kids joy, the song does not violate any other rules (language, etc.), and he is only singing it during the times when singing is allowed. I don’t see why his singing should be curtailed by her musical taste. I absolutely understand that a kid singing a song you hate 100 times in a row is annoying (I don’t like the song either), but that is the nature of kids. Our job as parents and teachers is to put our personal feelings aside and do what is best for the child. How should I approach her about this?
—Little Singer’s Mom
Dear Little Singer’s Mom,
Your son’s teacher is under no obligation to put her personal feelings aside at all times. She has a right to a workplace that is pleasant and tolerable. Frankly, I think she’s being generous. Listening to a song that you despise once is bad enough. Three is a gift.
If my own child asked me to play a song that I despised while we were driving in the car, I might agree to play the damn thing, but three times? No. It is not a teacher’s job to put aside our personal feelings so that children can live their preferred existence. It’s our job to set limits for children and let them know when their behavior is annoying.
Honestly, I think this teacher is helping your son in the long run. She’s requiring him to expand his musical palette while making him understand that the world will not bend to his cultural preferences. He doesn’t get final say on his environment. Your son will have to contend with authority figures, popular opinion, and societal norms throughout his entire life. Consider this moment a good start.
—Mr. Dicks
That is all very reasonable, and my son is adjusting well to this rule. The problem is that my son and several of his classmates LOVE the song “Old Town Road.” At home, he sings it all day long. At school, the teacher prohibits the number of times they can sing this particular song. They are only allowed to sing it three times per play period, and the only reason she prohibits them from singing it more is that she hates the song. To me, that seems irrelevant. This is the song that brings the kids joy, the song does not violate any other rules (language, etc.), and he is only singing it during the times when singing is allowed. I don’t see why his singing should be curtailed by her musical taste. I absolutely understand that a kid singing a song you hate 100 times in a row is annoying (I don’t like the song either), but that is the nature of kids. Our job as parents and teachers is to put our personal feelings aside and do what is best for the child. How should I approach her about this?
—Little Singer’s Mom
Dear Little Singer’s Mom,
Your son’s teacher is under no obligation to put her personal feelings aside at all times. She has a right to a workplace that is pleasant and tolerable. Frankly, I think she’s being generous. Listening to a song that you despise once is bad enough. Three is a gift.
If my own child asked me to play a song that I despised while we were driving in the car, I might agree to play the damn thing, but three times? No. It is not a teacher’s job to put aside our personal feelings so that children can live their preferred existence. It’s our job to set limits for children and let them know when their behavior is annoying.
Honestly, I think this teacher is helping your son in the long run. She’s requiring him to expand his musical palette while making him understand that the world will not bend to his cultural preferences. He doesn’t get final say on his environment. Your son will have to contend with authority figures, popular opinion, and societal norms throughout his entire life. Consider this moment a good start.
—Mr. Dicks
no subject
no subject
Ridin' on a tractor
Lean all in my bladder
Cheated on my baby
You can go and ask her
My life is a movie
Bull ridin' and boobies
Cowboy hat from Gucci
Wrangler on my booty
Because, I mean, yeah, that doesn't have any profanity in it, but it seems like an awkward fixation for a kindergartner.
no subject
My favorite song when I was four was "Bad to the Bone" and, which:
I make a rich woman beg, yeah
And I'll make a good woman steal
I'll make an old woman blush
And make a young girl squeal
I wanna be yours, pretty baby
Yours and yours alone
I'm…
Bad to the bone
B-b-b-b-b-b-b-bad
B-b-b-b-b-b-b-bad
B-b-b-b-b-b-b-bad
Bad to the bone
And at six I had learned the (not censored for radio) Reba McIntire cover of Fancy and sang it incessantly:
It wasn't very long after a benevolent man
Took me off the street
And one week later I was pourin' his tea
In a five room hotel suite
I charmed a king, a congressman
And an occasional aristocrat
Then I got me a Georgia mansion
In an elegant New York townhouse flat
And I ain't done bad
no subject
Can't nobody tell me nothin'
You can't tell me nothin'
Can't nobody tell me nothin'
You can't tell me nothin'
no subject
My mum still likes to morify me by reminding me that I spent a year, aged 7 obsessed with songs such as 'I'm horny', 'sex bomb' and 'mambo number 5'
no subject
https://genius.com/Jule-styne-let-me-entertain-you-lyrics
LOL
Also, I think the teacher is being perfectly reasonable!
no subject
I'm sure you killed it XD
no subject
no subject
We could tell he had no idea what the line meant because he rendered it "If there are any girls there, I want to do that!" We still cut down on how much he got to listen to it after that.
no subject
Please consider: A brief history of black artists in country music/"Is Old Town Road by Lil Nas X Real Country Music?" on the Say It Loud youtube channel, produced by PBS.
https://youtu.be/Bh8GZox-D3M
no subject
no subject
And I think one of the things that does make this particular song potentially irritating is that it's more of a "we will rock you" when the content (especially the content of the video, which gives so much more context) demands it be a "bohemian rhapsody" -- I want the extended remix. Lil Nas X! That is a great chorus you have there! A fantastic bridge! It would make an EVEN BETTER dance ballad. (It's also stuck in my head now.)
But also, kiddos are SO LOUD. and SO EMPHATIC. and LOUD.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
That said, a) I don't love the STOP SUPPRESSING MY CHILD'S UNIIIIIIQUENESS whiffs I'm getting from the letter, and b) this is not a huge encroachment on your kid's human rights, lady, go find another hill to die on. Like, as Oppressive Authoritarian Rules go, this one doesn't even rate. Chill out.
no subject
I do definitely agree about the "oppression!" nonsense. I mean, "what is best for the child" is definitely not learning that a classroom won't have any rules or requirements that don't put his personal wants (not needs, but wants) first.
no subject
To which my response (and my friend's) was "these children need to learn to live in a society, with fellow people. Learning to stand in line is absolutely a vital life skill. It's got nothing to do with oppressing their natural creativity, and everything to do with teaching them how to live in a community with other people."
That's how I feel about the singing, as well. If you are teaching your kid that their pleasure and creativity is so important that (1) it's more important than any disruption that the education professional says it is doing to your education, which is the reason you are in school, and (2) it's more important than the teacher having a functioning workplace, then you are teaching your kid wrong.
Moreover "Our job as parents and teachers is to put our personal feelings aside and do what is best for the child," um, LW is saying some correct words in a totally incorrect fashion. Leaving aside the LW's assumption that "what is best for the child" is "I can do whatever I want whenever I want", which, as you say, is ridiculous, the obligations of a parent and a teacher are totally different. While I may personally think that this parent is also doing bad parenting, that's none of my business. But the teacher is an employed member of the labor market with a job, which people seem to forget. Parents have a very different societal role than employees, who have to do their job (educating the children in a supportive and nurturing environment, etc. etc.), but absolutely don't have to "put their personal feelings aside." That's anti-labor bullshit which entirely comes from the idea that most primary/elementary school teachers are women.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject