ashbet: (Default)
ashbet ([personal profile] ashbet) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2025-02-27 11:47 pm

Missing missing reasons, wiretap edition

Dear Amy: After my two granddaughters’ last visit (ages 13 and 11), my son informed me that they had recorded one of our conversations.

My son was upset by the content of the conversation but not by the fact that these two secretly recorded me.

It makes me wonder how often they’ve done this and who else they have done this to. (The girls have a lot of overnight play dates at their friends’ homes.)

I am really upset about this. Should I be?

Now I don’t allow the phones in my home, and this is creating a real problem.

Is this a violation of my privacy?


Frustrated Grandma: Yes, secretly recording you is a violation of your privacy. Yes, it is wrong of these girls to do this (it is also illegal in some states).

But this sort of behavior is within the normal range for younger adolescents, who are devoted to testing, pushing and experimenting.

Maybe when you were that age you prank-called people? This is an equivalent, and I agree that there are unintended (and intended) consequences of their choice to do this.

I hope you will use this episode as an opportunity to talk to these girls about privacy — not only yours, but theirs. I don’t think you should ban phones from your home, but forgive them for this episode and be open to the possibility that they will have learned from it.
minoanmiss: world's oldest olive tree, in Crete. (Minoan Tree)

[personal profile] minoanmiss 2025-02-28 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)

RIGHT????

petrea_mitchell: (Default)

[personal profile] petrea_mitchell 2025-02-28 03:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Part of me is hoping that the real story is Grandma was trying to give the granddaughters some straight talk about controlling when and how they get pregnant, and they made the recording to score points with a Christian fundamentalist dad by tattling on her.

...but I admit that's not a very likely scenario. Racist/nationalist/etc talk is much more likely.
Edited (Expanding comment) 2025-02-28 15:17 (UTC)
conuly: (Default)

[personal profile] conuly 2025-02-28 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
Amy, wtf.
mrissa: (Default)

[personal profile] mrissa 2025-02-28 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Seriously SERIOUSLY

How do you get from "I was saying things that were bad enough that my grandkids wanted proof I'd said them when talking to their parents about it" to "this is like a prank"?
sushiflop: (hange; that horse looks sick)

[personal profile] sushiflop 2025-02-28 06:05 am (UTC)(link)
"My son was upset by the content of the conversation but not by the fact that these two secretly recorded me."

I often think when letter writers elide details that they often enough have just not thought themselves through very well, are writing in a more stream of consciousness fashion, or are assuming that of course everyone knows they aren't thinking or doing (x unreasonable thing) that is not clear to some readers but

there is a BLACK HOLE SIZED gap in the story here. WHAT WAS THE CONVERSATION ABOUT, LW??
topaz_eyes: (blue cat's eye)

[personal profile] topaz_eyes 2025-02-28 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
My son was upset by the content of the conversation but not by the fact that these two secretly recorded me.

I think there is a non-zero possibility LW's son specifically asked his kids to record whatever this conversation was. Maybe for proof of what LW was saying to them.

LW has the right to be upset, yes. But if whatever she was saying was dangerous to the kids, then that kind of supercedes LW's feelings.

Now I don’t allow the phones in my home, and this is creating a real problem.

LW's son won't allow his daughters to visit her anymore?
pauraque: patterned brown and white bird flying on a pale blue background (Default)

[personal profile] pauraque 2025-02-28 01:54 pm (UTC)(link)
LW's son won't allow his daughters to visit her anymore?

I suspect you are right that this is what LW sees as the problem, and I also suspect that for the granddaughters and their dad, it is not a problem but rather a solution.
lilysea: Serious (Default)

[personal profile] lilysea 2025-02-28 03:23 pm (UTC)(link)
While it is possible that the girl's father is divorced, and that what upset the son was LW defending the girl's mother and LW's former daughter in law

I think the most likely scenario is

a) racism
b) fatphobia
c) homophobia
mrissa: (Default)

[personal profile] mrissa 2025-03-01 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
It's also possible that the girls' father is divorced and that what upset the son was LW tearing into the mother of his children. I have known several people who worked SUPER hard to create a cordial co-parenting relationship in the middle of and after divorce only to have their parents create difficulties for the kids by diving into exactly the adversarial relationship the divorcing couple has avoided.
ioplokon: tye-dye goose image from the padres-dodgers series (silly goose)

[personal profile] ioplokon 2025-02-28 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
*goose meme* WHAT WAS THE CONTENT OF THE CONVERSATION?