conuly: (Default)
conuly ([personal profile] conuly) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2019-12-03 03:39 pm
Entry tags:

MIL Ignores Food Allergy Issues

DEAR SOMEONE ELSE’S MOM: Both our oldest daughter and I have several food allergies, including nuts, wheat, and shellfish. But almost every single time we eat over at my in-law’s, my mother-in-law puts out little bowls of nuts, and has shrimp cocktails, and then serves a pasta main course. The shrimp we can avoid, and the two of us have learned to eat something before we go for dinner, but my daughter is so sensitive to nuts that even the residual oils left behind from the nuts can give her a reaction.

I have spoken to my mother-in-law about this more than once, and she just doesn’t seem to get it. I am at the point of not going to her house anymore, which I know will hurt her, but I have to protect myself and my daughter. I don’t think I have a choice, do you? --- ALLERGIC MOM OF AN ALLERGIC CHILD


DEAR ALLERGIC MOM OF AN ALLERGIC CHILD: I absolutely agree you need to protect your child and yourself.

If your mother-in-law can’t learn to work around your allergies, then either only dine with them at your place, or suggest meeting at restaurants that you know can accommodate your needs.

It also seems like your husband, if he hasn’t, should step in and explain things to his mom. Coming from her son, it might make more of an impression.

https://www.uexpress.com/ask-someone-elses-mom/2019/12/3/mil-ignores-food-allergy-issues
watersword: Keira Knightley, in Pride and Prejudice (2007), turning her head away from the viewer, the word "elizabeth" written near (Default)

[personal profile] watersword 2019-12-03 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
There is a word for people who try to make you consume substances that will kill you. That word is poisoner.

(Yes, I know, the LW didn't say the allergies are potentially fatal.)
shirou: (cloud)

[personal profile] shirou 2019-12-03 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Why is this a thing? We've seen a lot of variations on the theme of relatives willfully sabotaging an allergic person's efforts to avoid food allergens. I just don't get it.
minoanmiss: Maiden holding a quince (Quince Maiden)

[personal profile] minoanmiss 2019-12-03 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Why do people do this kind of thing. Why.
Edited 2019-12-03 22:49 (UTC)
onlysmallwings: a white cup of black tea with a slice of lemon floating in it (Default)

[personal profile] onlysmallwings 2019-12-03 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You not being in her house is what MIL wants. And if your spouse is unwilling to address their mother's behavior towards you and your child(!!!), it is safer for you both to yield to that desire. If she is going to provide foods that poison a child, there is almost* no chance of family harmony.

*(i say almost to allow the possibility of LW's spouse addressing things in a way that leads to MIL changing her ways. small chance, i know.)
cereta: Jason X poster (horror)

[personal profile] cereta 2019-12-04 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
What the fuck is wrong with people where allergies/intolerances/etc are concerned? My BiL was giving me shit just last week because I wouldn't eat a piece of chocolate, and expressing skepticism when I said it would make my headache 10x worse.

I think there's an important addendum, here. Under no circumstances should your daughter be left alone with her grandparents, or anyone else who is not actively protesting MiL's behavior. It's not safe.
azurelunatic: Vivid pink Alaskan wild rose. (Default)

[personal profile] azurelunatic 2019-12-05 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
The amount of emotional "hurt" she's going to be from not seeing any of you anymore is nothing compared to the potential physical harm from the allergens. Cutting her off is an extremely mild step to ensure the kid's safety.
fred_mouse: line drawing of sheep coloured in queer flag colours with dream bubble reading 'dreamwidth' (Default)

[personal profile] fred_mouse 2019-12-08 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing missing in this is the one that I've seen elsewhere that says approximately 'you don't just have a MIL issue, you have a husband issue'. Because 'explaining' this isn't what is needed.