minoanmiss: Minoan lady watching the Thera eruption (Lady and Eruption)
minoanmiss ([personal profile] minoanmiss) wrote in [community profile] agonyaunt2025-08-05 12:21 am

Ask a Manager: Two From The Same Column

Compare and Contrast.



1. Employee’s husband sent revenge porn to a bunch of her coworkers I am in HR at the head office for a small construction company, and recently a colleague who has been going through a divorce experienced a pretty embarrassing incident, although it’s something I consider a non-issue. I think everyone is assuming it was from the husband, but recently everyone in the office with a publicly available work email received an email from an anonymous account with a video showing one of our female colleagues participating in a wet t-shirt contest at a nightclub. At one point she even showed her breasts to the crowd.

I spoke with the colleague and she is very embarrassed and hoping she would not get in trouble because of this. I told her at the time I didn’t believe her participation in a wet t-shirt contest while on vacation was a workplace issue and that she was not in trouble. She is a great person to have in the office and she does great work. She told me she was sorry but I told her not to apologize. We have all done crazy things in our lives. Everyone in our office feels bad, and the women especially are infuriated at what we assume was her husband sending this out. I’m assuming as well that you would agree it’s not something there should be any consequences for at work and that we should move on and get back to work.

The problem is that everyone cannot stop talking about it, and I need to come up with a way to help things get past this. Why can’t everyone be mature adults? Should I consider asking the colleague in the video to send an email to everyone to acknowledge what happened? There are even other colleagues offering to share wild things they have done to make her feel less embarrassed (no videos, of course, just verbal). We’re just looking to get past this distraction and get everyone, including the embarrassed colleague, back to work productively. All the women in the office feel that we cannot let her a##@@&$ husband win. What do we do going forward?


Your initial instincts were perfect: this is not a work issue (and her husband is an asshole).

Definitely do not ask the employee to email the office about it! She’s already dealing with enough; she shouldn’t be asked to shoulder that burden on top of everything else. Instead, talk the people who are continuing to discuss what happened. Tell them that the continued discussion, even if stemming from support from their colleague, is making the situation worse for her by keeping the topic alive in your office. Say that it’s her private business and not something that should be getting discussed at work at all and conversation about it needs to stop, lest it create a less safe or harassing environment for the employee. That’s true even though everyone is supportive of her! She still deserves to be able to come to work without people talking about what her husband did. Shut it down — with the people who are still talking about it, not with the victim.

You should also make sure your employee knows there are laws against revenge porn in most states and at the federal level, and that you support her in pursuing that angle if she decides to.






4. Delivery person uses our lunchroom We get delivery pretty much daily via a big name shipping company. Within the last few months, the driver has taken to having his lunch in our staff lunchroom — using our microwave, tables, and chairs in an area that is off limits to the public. To my knowledge, he didn’t ask anyone if he could; he just started doing it. He’s usually in there around my scheduled lunch hour, and while I don’t begrudge him a place to eat, it does make me uncomfortable that he’s there. Should I bring this to the attention of my supervisor, or would it just make me look like an inconsiderate ass?

It depends entirely on what your company’s security policies are. A lot of companies would have no problem with someone who was there on legitimate business using their lunchroom. Others would. If your sense is that yours wouldn’t care and the guy isn’t being disruptive, there’s nothing wrong with letting him eat there (especially if you’re a pretty large company and it’s not a small office with limited lunchroom space that others are being squeezed out of).

adrian_turtle: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] adrian_turtle 2025-08-05 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't expect people to be so alarmed by familiar UPS drivers. Dogs, maybe. Not people.
lilysea: Serious (Default)

[personal profile] lilysea 2025-08-05 05:26 am (UTC)(link)
The only valid reason I can see for having doubts about the UPS driver sharing the lunchroom is added COVID risk [especially because the UPS driver, by the very nature of their job, has face to face contact with dozens of different people every day], and it doesn't seem like this has crossed LW's mind.
dissectionist: A digital artwork of a biomechanical horse, head and shoulder only. It’s done in shades of grey and black and there are alien-like spines and rib-like structures over its body. (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] dissectionist 2025-08-05 05:46 am (UTC)(link)
It may well be manufactured. An acquaintance of mine who ran a bike forum discovered that Russian bots (not actually bots but people) had been coming into the forum to start arguments from both sides. It wasn’t even that they had a side they wanted people to believe, it’s just that they were there to spur polarization and bitter dissent. His takeaway was that if Russian saboteurs are being sent onto mid-level cyclist forums (of all things!) to drive people apart, they’re going to be everywhere.

So is it possible your commenter was someone who genuinely believed what they were saying? Sure. But it’s also entirely possible it’s someone who’s getting paid to help destabilize other societies, and they do so by making people feel appalled and/or angry at others. It may well just be empty words designed to provoke.
conuly: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] conuly 2025-08-05 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
I think it was fueled mainly by a commenter (who IMO disqualified themself from their username) who insisted that ever letting any driver into one's business premises would get someone raped

I'm sure UPS drivers are no more likely to rape people while on the job than literally anybody else.
conuly: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] conuly 2025-08-05 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
An acquaintance of mine who ran a bike forum discovered that Russian bots (not actually bots but people) had been coming into the forum to start arguments from both sides.

I read an analysis of how they operate, and it's pretty damn sophisticated, with each poster taking a specific role. Can't lie, their propaganda machine is really good at this.
topaz_eyes: bluejay in left profile looking upwards (Default)

[personal profile] topaz_eyes 2025-08-05 06:11 am (UTC)(link)
Re #4, this is key: It depends entirely on what your company’s security policies are. I think the important point here is that even if all the workers recognize him, the driver is not a company employee; he's an outside visitor. If the driver does not have official permission from LW's company to eat in the staff lunchroom, he is technically trespassing, which could create a potential liability for the company if an incident ever occurred while he was present in that lunchroom. Eg would the driver know how to evacuate that part of the building safely, or how to get to the muster point. Imho LW should raise the issue with her supervisor to confirm the policy.

(Where I used to work, because of the nature of the worksite, all site visitors had to be approved, accompanied by an employee, and could only be there on official business. This driver would have been banned from the site if he ever tried to eat lunch in our lunchroom.)
Edited (added a detail) 2025-08-05 06:12 (UTC)
oursin: George Beresford photograph of Marie of Roumania, overwritten 'And I AM Marie of Roumania' (Marie of Roumania)

[personal profile] oursin 2025-08-05 08:53 am (UTC)(link)
There may be a classism thing in operation - way back in my youth one uni vacation I was working in the staff restaurant of some business, and they used to feed the porter somewhat surreptitious out of sight behind the scenes, because technically manual staff had to eat in the staff canteen, unlike the office bods.

But I do think the major issue is, are there questions of site security, and at least the need for permission for h&s reasons.
ioplokon: purple cloth (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] ioplokon 2025-08-05 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, imagine having a government job posting mid takes about Marianne Vos.
Edited (Spelling) 2025-08-05 12:59 (UTC)
dissectionist: A digital artwork of a biomechanical horse, head and shoulder only. It’s done in shades of grey and black and there are alien-like spines and rib-like structures over its body. (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] dissectionist 2025-08-05 01:58 pm (UTC)(link)
NGL, I was really impressed (horrified but impressed) when I read about their handling of Covid. The propaganda they targeted their own Russian people with was all based around, “We’re smart people who follow science, unlike those Americans who are rejecting knowledge” while they targeted North Americans with anti-vaccine propaganda. They didn’t want to risk their own people becoming anti-science and falling prey to communicable disease while they encouraged everyone else in the world to reject medicine and fall prey to communicable disease. It was like giving their own people an antidote while giving everyone poison.
dissectionist: A digital artwork of a biomechanical horse, head and shoulder only. It’s done in shades of grey and black and there are alien-like spines and rib-like structures over its body. (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] dissectionist 2025-08-05 02:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to believe that every Russian bot-person is someone who has been raised deeply nationalistic and believes they’re fighting for the survival of the Russian people, because the thought that there’s that many people who are totally fine with what they’re doing, clocking in every day to spread hate among people they’ll never meet and then clocking out to go meet friends at the pub and watch some TV while feeling nothing about what they’ve done that day, is just too dismaying. It’s like they’ve assembled vast numbers of psychopaths who have no empathy for others at all. So the idea that these are people who have just been very, very misled from birth to believe that they’re in a war and awful things are necessary in war, feels better to me than an army of remorseless monsters.

And yeah, the idea that all that is being weaponized against hobby cyclists, for goodness’s sake, should be absurdist comedy. This happened just pre-Covid, but ever since I’ve felt dubious any time someone has rushed in somewhere semi-popular - no matter the topic - to post something inflammatory. Unless I directly know them myself in physical space, I’ll never know whether it’s real, it’s someone misled by disinformation, or it’s a disinformer.
yarnandglue: (Default)

[personal profile] yarnandglue 2025-08-05 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
LW 1 - "Wow, there's a serious issue with employee relations and bullying in this workplace. Someone should do something about this...I'm not sure who though...", said the HR person is...a classic HR move XD
ioplokon: purple cloth (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] ioplokon 2025-08-05 02:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm reading a French book on Russia's internet policies (Genèse d'un autoritarisme numérique) & it seems like a mix of indoctrination via steadily ratcheting up information control and suppression of dissent, and just... A general numbness to the absurdity of Russian political life (plus trolling cyclists has gotta be better than being in the army).
dissectionist: A digital artwork of a biomechanical horse, head and shoulder only. It’s done in shades of grey and black and there are alien-like spines and rib-like structures over its body. (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] dissectionist 2025-08-05 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
it seems like a mix of indoctrination via steadily ratcheting up information control and suppression of dissent, and just... A general numbness to the absurdity of Russian political life

That makes sense. When you grow up somewhere and you’ve never known anything different, to a fish it’s just the water the fish swims in: so normal it isn’t even visible or noticed.

(plus trolling cyclists has gotta be better than being in the army).

If I had to be in a war, I’d do everything I could to get a desk job where I wasn’t being shot at or put through physical misery constantly. 100% relatable.
castiron: cartoony sketch of owl (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] castiron 2025-08-05 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah, fond memories of a family dog who hated the UPS truck. No problem with the mail carrier; no problem with FedEx; it was specifically the UPS truck. If I was walking him and a UPS truck drove by, he'd immediately go into chase mode and have to be hauled back. One time he got out of the house when Mom was opening the door to get the package, and he circled the UPS truck barking until Mom caught him and hauled him back inside. He didn't seem to be bothered by the driver, or at least didn't try to jump in the open truck door; the truck itself was his nemesis.
conuly: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] conuly 2025-08-05 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
lus trolling cyclists has gotta be better than being in the army

Oh yeah.
magid: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] magid 2025-08-05 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Whoa!

Also, this makes me think how in Ender’s Game (or one of the sequels? But I think it’s the first book), Ender’s brother and sister go on the nets to argue various opposing positions, masking the fact that they were still children/teens by setting up personae as Demosthenes and Hobbes.

I like it a lot better in fiction….
mildred_of_midgard: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] mildred_of_midgard 2025-08-05 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I was thinking the exact same thing!
ysobel: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] ysobel 2025-08-05 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Locke, not Hobbes, but yeah. (It's the first book.)
magid: (Default)

Re: This set surprised me

[personal profile] magid 2025-08-05 08:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You’re right; how could I have gotten that mixed up?!
katiedid717: (Default)

[personal profile] katiedid717 2025-08-07 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Re: delivery driver, I feel like a lot of this depends on the size of the company - there's a big difference between a delivery driver using the cafeteria at a hospital, for example, than using the kitchenette of a 5-person office. I think the type of business can also make a difference, like a small medical practice or legal firm dealing with confidential information may not want someone from outside of the company in a private common area.

I spent 11 years working at my family's company, and we had a small private conference room right next to our kitchenette. Everyone working in the office was at the owner/executive level so there weren't really any concerns about office personnel overhearing something, but there were definitely meetings where our own employees were asked to come back in an hour for things like emptying the trash or running the vacuum.