Imho this guy's plan is definitely against the spirit of the "bonding leave" policy, and the petty part of me kinda hopes it backfires on him. (I'm guessing he won't be working for a competitor, as some employers may have rules about working for other companies. I'm not sure what the company would think if they found out they were subsidizing an employee's benefits while that employee works for someone else.) Seems to me he's taking a risk though, that could end up screwing over his colleagues later.
no subject